<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fugitive Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge</link>
	<description>Escape from the Planet of the Robotic Bureaucrats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Generalising From Experiments</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2447&#038;seed_title=Generalising+From+Experiments</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2447&#038;seed_title=Generalising+From+Experiments#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I rely heavily on experimental studies of human behaviour in my work. I also <a href="http://www.observv.com">travel around the world</a> and see very different patterns of behaviour from culture to culture. So when a new experimental study is published and I find out that the subjects are all American undergrads, I tend to discount the results because of my suspicions about limited applicability. Here's a paper that sheds light on how much I should be discounting.<br />
<a href="http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/files/2013/03/Weird_People_BBS_final02.pdf">The Weirdest People In The World</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2447</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Receiving Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2439&#038;seed_title=Receiving+Advice</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2439&#038;seed_title=Receiving+Advice#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across <a href="http://blog.yimmyayo.com/post/40637518824">this recipe</a> and wondered about the superficial nature of most pop management advice. Then I revisited Gino et al.'s research on receiving advice. We're more likely to heed costly advice from confident experts under difficult circumstances. We're less likely to heed advice if we're feeling powerful, competitive, and angry. Obviously, there's more to it than that, which is why you should read these articles. <br />
<a href="http://francescagino.com/pdfs/tost_gino_larrick_obhdp_2012.pdf">Power and Competitiveness</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://francescagino.com/pdfs/gino_brooks_schweitzer_jpsp_2012.pdf">Anxiety and Confidence</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://www.cirano.qc.ca/ee/ESA2004/papers/Gino.pdf">Cost of Advice</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://cbdr.cmu.edu/seminar/gino.pdf">Task Difficulty</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2439</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning Styles</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2435&#038;seed_title=Learning+Styles</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2435&#038;seed_title=Learning+Styles#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're all predisposed to certain ways of learning. There's a lot of disagreement about what these cognitive and learning styles are and how we can best take advantage of them. Zhang et al. have a useful overview of the controversies in their edited book <i>Handbook of Intellectual Styles</i> (2012).<br /><a href="http://www.springerpub.com/samples/9780826106674_chapter.pdf">Chapter:  Intellectual Styles</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2435</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kludgeocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2431&#038;seed_title=Kludgeocracy</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2431&#038;seed_title=Kludgeocracy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 05:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A kluge in computer programming is a short-term fix to a problem. It's inelegant, clumsy even, but it works at the time. Eventually, these obscure patch-jobs and bits of jerry-rigging build up to create an incoherent mess. A similar phenomenon happens in organisations as policies and procedures are added, one atop the other. Steven Teles calls this "kludgeocracy". Unanticipated consequences follow. So does a "kluge industry" (consultants, activists, and so forth) to help the organisation cope with the incoherence and complexity&#8212;an unhealthy dependency.<br />
<a href="http://newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/Teles_Steven_Kludgeocracy_NAF_Dec2012.pdf">Essay: Kludgeocracy</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2431</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skill Vs. Luck</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2417&#038;seed_title=Skill+Vs.+Luck</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2417&#038;seed_title=Skill+Vs.+Luck#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 02:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've discussed luck and management hype <a href="http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=40">before</a>. It's time to revisit. Michael Mauboussin has written a new book, <i>The Success Equation</i> (2012), that looks at attempts to untangle the role of skill versus luck. (I liked his last book, <i>Think Twice</i>, 2009.) Here are some ideas that appear in the book: <br />
<a href="http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/us_consulting_persistencerandomsearchfor_April2009.pdf">Random Search for Excellence</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://changethis.com/manifesto/100.03.SuccessEquation/pdf/100.03.SuccessEquation.pdf">The Paradox of Skill</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://www.lmcm.com/868299.pdf">Untangling Skill and Luck</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2417</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Complexity Viz</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2411&#038;seed_title=Economic+Complexity+Viz</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2411&#038;seed_title=Economic+Complexity+Viz#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm somewhat sceptical of the value of summary governance indicators. Yet I do appreciate an interesting experiment. Here's an attempt to gauge the amount of "productive knowledge" in an economy, renamed (for some reason) as "economic complexity". The claim is that this is an improvement in predictive power over the usual development indicators. (Read the bits about Greece and Portugal.) More interesting is the way the data is displayed: with lots of graphics. This is the direction policy-statistics reporting is going.<br />
<a href="http://atlas.media.mit.edu/media/atlas/pdf/HarvardMIT_AtlasOfEconomicComplexity_Part_I.pdf">Atlas of Economic Complexity</a> (PDF)<br /><a href="http://atlas.media.mit.edu/">More graphics</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2411</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collective Engagement</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2408&#038;seed_title=Collective+Engagement</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2408&#038;seed_title=Collective+Engagement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frog, a design firm, just released a toolkit for collective action. It contains a number of useful activities for group collaboration. Compare it to this guide on public engagement, which also lists some interesting collaboration methods.<br />
<a href="http://info.frogdesign.com/rs/aricent/images/frog_collective_action_toolkit.pdf">Collective Action Toolkit</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://www.ncdd.org/files/NCDD2010_Engagement_Streams.pdf">Engagement Streams Framework</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2408</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing Governance Context</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2381&#038;seed_title=Changing+Governance+Context</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2381&#038;seed_title=Changing+Governance+Context#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The busybodies at the World Economic Forum tweeted a question that got me thinking: "How has the international context changed and what impact will it have on global governance?" In reply, before my morning coffee had a chance to kick in, I rattled off a list of trends that have been on my mind lately. Here's my list with a bit more elaboration. <a href="http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2381">More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2381</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaboration</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2375&#038;seed_title=Collaboration</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2375&#038;seed_title=Collaboration#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This poster is a handout for a speech I gave a couple of years ago. The poster was a big hit. Advice: take advantage of the digital printing revolution to offer unique take-away gifts to audiences, preferably containing a big payload of insight, instead of handing out cryptic bullet-point-slide printouts.<br /><a href="http://stoyko.net/fugitive/PDF/Collab.pdf">Collaborative Rhythm &#038; Flow</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2375</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Belonging, Rejection, and Creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2368&#038;seed_title=Belonging%2C+Rejection%2C+and+Creativity</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2368&#038;seed_title=Belonging%2C+Rejection%2C+and+Creativity#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As social animals, our self-esteem is somewhat reliant on a sense of belonging within groups. Group involvement comes with pressures to conform, however, which can stifle individual creativity. Thus, independent-minded creatives can be leery about group involvement. Are they better able to handle rejection from the group? Does the rejection actually make them feel more distinctive and, thus, make them more creative? This forthcoming journal article argues that it happens. This is an interesting finding given the importance of bringing an outsider perspective into a group as a way of bolstering creativity.<br />
<a href="http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1622&#038;context=articles&#038;sei-redir=1&#038;referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%2522outside%2520advantage%253A%2520can%2520social%2520rejection%2520fuel%2520creative%2520thought%253F%2522%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26ved%3D0CCEQFjAA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fdigitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu%252Fcgi%252Fviewcontent.cgi%253Farticle%253D1622%2526context%253Darticles%26ei%3D_95ZUN-oIYaHywHCioGQCw%26usg%3DAFQjCNF3fqu6W1Q6loJnZm32-RToJ8a2og#search=%22outside%20advantage%3A%20can%20social%20rejection%20fuel%20creative%20thought%3F%22">Outside Advantage</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2368</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art of Not Knowing</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2335&#038;seed_title=The+Art+of+Not+Knowing</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2335&#038;seed_title=The+Art+of+Not+Knowing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig Coggle: "Not knowing is a key ingredient in change and growth. ... Once we let go of being so damn certain, we open up to new possibilities. Being open to new possibilities means that we become more adaptable, and that means that we are more likely to cope with unpredictable change and uncertainty. In this day and age this sort of resilience is crucial to our success." More here:<br />
<a href="http://changethis.com/manifesto/97.03.NotKnowing/pdf/97.03.NotKnowing.pdf">The Art of Not Knowing</a>
  
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2335</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guilt-proneness</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2326&#038;seed_title=Guilt-proneness</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2326&#038;seed_title=Guilt-proneness#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flynn &#038; Schaumberg have been publishing articles about how the tendency to feel guilty has positive implications for the workplace. The guilt-prone are more committed to their employer: "guilt motivates individuals to exert greater effort on their work-related tasks that, in turn, strengthens their affinity for the organization." They are also rated as better leaders because they have a greater sense of responsibility. Unfortunately, those articles (<a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&#038;id=2011-13408-001">1</a> and <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545748">2</a>) are behind a pay-wall. But these new articles by Cohen et al. aren't. The authors show that the guilt-prone are more ethical and less likely to behave counter-productively. <br />
<a href="https://student-3k.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/WP/2012-E17.pdf">Character and Ethics</a><br />
<a href="https://student-3k.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/wp/2012-E9.pdf">Counter-productive Behaviours</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2326</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bureaucratisation</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2322&#038;seed_title=Bureaucratisation</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2322&#038;seed_title=Bureaucratisation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 02:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kurt Eichenwald on Microsoft's decline as an organisation: "More employees seeking management slots led to more managers, more managers led to more meetings, more meetings led to more memos, and more red tape led to less innovation.". I recommend reading the entire exposé, which is based on interviews with former employees.<br />
<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2012/08/microsoft-lost-mojo-steve-ballmer">Article</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2322</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maeda On Stage</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2310&#038;seed_title=Maeda+On+Stage</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2310&#038;seed_title=Maeda+On+Stage#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Maeda's <i>Redesigning Leadership</i> (2011) is on my list of the top five leadership books published last year. It's in the mould of Richard Farson's <i>Management of the Absurd</i> (1997): the story of a practitioner who, somewhat reluctantly, gets thrust into a position of administrative authority and subsequently reflects on the experience. Maeda is an artist and designer, two things that are vital to innovating businesses. So he is well placed to provide some interesting insights on how leadership is evolving. Here are some recent talks on the subject.<br />
<a href="http://vimeo.com/15673277">Looking For Superman</a><br />
<a href="http://vimeo.com/29166945">STEM to STEAM</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0Es3qYI4_Y">Redesigning Leadership</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2310</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INFO Bulletin</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2303&#038;seed_title=INFO+Bulletin</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2303&#038;seed_title=INFO+Bulletin#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 17:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular readers may be interested in my new bulletin, called INFO. It touches on a number of workplace topics and trends that I don't discuss here because I reserve Fugitive Knowledge for substantive, long-form writing. (I also write the <i>Leadership Insight Letter</i>, a biannual newsletter about the state of the leadership literature, but you'll have to <a href="http://www.stoyko.net">e-mail me</a> directly to get on that mailing list.)<br />
<a href="http://www.stoyko.info">Info Bulletin</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2303</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amabile&#8217;s Updates on Creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2297&#038;seed_title=Amabile%26%238217%3Bs+Updates+on+Creativity</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2297&#038;seed_title=Amabile%26%238217%3Bs+Updates+on+Creativity#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Theresa Amabile's model of workplace creativity has been influential since she published <i>Creativity In Context</i> (1996). She talks about the subsequent evolution of the model in this new working paper. Also, her research on "inner working life" and work engagement was a big hit last autumn (<i>The Progress Principle</i>, 2011). So here are some links about that too.<br />
<a href="http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/12-096.pdf">Working Paper: Creativity</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://www.progressprinciple.com/documents/amabile_the_progress_principle_introduction.pdf">Book Chapter: Progress Principle</a> (PDF)<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD6N8bsjOEE&#038;feature=player_embedded">Speech: Progress Principle</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2297</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kantor on Conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2279&#038;seed_title=Kantor+on+Conversation</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2279&#038;seed_title=Kantor+on+Conversation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My thinking about dialogue dynamics is strongly influenced by David Kantor's model, as described in William Isaac's seminal book <i>Dialogue</i> (1999). Strangely, Kantor himself hasn't published anything about the model ... until last week. The book <i>Reading The Room</i> (2012) talks about noticing and interpreting conversational dynamics. This introductory chapter discusses Kantor's basic framework.<br /><a href="http://media.wiley.com/product_data/excerpt/30/04709034/0470903430-403.pdf">Chapter: Reading The Room</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2279</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workplace Gossip</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2275&#038;seed_title=Workplace+Gossip</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2275&#038;seed_title=Workplace+Gossip#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kathryn Waddington's book <i>Gossip and Organizations</i> (2012) comes out at the end of the month. While you're waiting, you can read this article.<br /><a href="http://wxy.seu.edu.cn/humanities/sociology/htmledit/uploadfile/system/20110121/20110121223928183.pdf">Gossip in Organisations</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2275</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Valve Handbook</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2265&#038;seed_title=The+Valve+Handbook</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2265&#038;seed_title=The+Valve+Handbook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behold: the employee-orientation manual of the future; except, I hasten to add, this manual is for an extremely successful company from the here and now, the video-game maker Valve. Take particular notice of the forthright language ... the lack of finger-wagging "thou shalts" ... and the networked, fluid, collaborative model of organisation, including the emphasis on mobile workspaces (a subject I've been thinking a lot about in the last few years).<br /><a href="http://cdn.flamehaus.com/Valve_Handbook_LowRes.pdf">The Valve Handbook</a> (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2265</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executives Without Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2252&#038;seed_title=Executives+Without+Intelligence</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoyko.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28rss2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stoyko.net%2Ffugitiveknowledge%2F%3Fp%3D2252&#038;seed_title=Executives+Without+Intelligence#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stoyko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?p=2252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this commentary, disgruntled consultant Eric Garland laments the dismal reception that sober analysis gets from bureaucratic executives: "The problem is, the market for intelligence is now largely about providing information that makes decision makers feel better, rather than bringing true insights about risk and opportunity. Our future is now being planned by people who seem to put their emotional comfort ahead of making decisions based on real&#8212;and often uncomfortable&#8212;information." When <i>speaking truth to power</i>, the response from <i>power</i> is far from rational: "Confusion, anger, and psychological transference are common responses to unwelcome analysis." That is why I develop teaching tools to help executives cope with biases, blind-spots, and mental traps. That's also why I offer advice on a take-it-or-leave-it basis and remain stoical when execs choose to leave it. That said, the "analytical amateurism" of charismatic leaders and overconfident bosses has become a serious decision-making problem in large organisations.<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/04/peak-intel-how-so-called-strategic-intelligence-actually-makes-us-dumber/255413/">Commentary: Peak Intel</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoyko.net/fugitiveknowledge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2252</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
